An important consideration for the Leadership Team is understanding different types of challenges that will arise when supporting implementation of an EBP. Heifetz (2009) identifies the importance of technical and adaptive leadership strategies and notes that one of the biggest mistakes leaders make is to incorrectly identify the type of challenge they are facing.
Full implementation of EBPs requires movement of a complex and entrenched system through meaningful change and understanding how to respond to resistance that can arise in the process. Transformative leaders learn how to make use of adaptive leadership, which offers useful ways to rethink and understand the work of leadership. For example, adaptive leaders understand the difference between “authority” as a formal position of power and “leadership” as the act of helping people achieve meaningful change. Heifetz & Linsky (2002) note that “authority” is organized to provide direction and maintain a stable system. When systems undergo change, the natural tendency of those in the system is to look to those in authority to minimize the tension of change and regain stability. This natural tendency toward status quo is exacerbated when formal authority inadvertently gets in the way of leadership efforts that are designed to support change. When organizations and systems are being changed on purpose, adaptive leadership is needed to manage the change process. Purposeful connections between the work of teams within and across the organization are an essential requirement for implementation of EBPs.
Technical challenges typically respond well to a more traditional management approach where problems are defined, solutions are generated, resources are garnered and tasks are assigned, managed, and monitored. A leader guides the overall process and is more “in charge.” This does not mean that technical challenges are easy nor does it mean that there won’t be adjustments to the plan, but technical challenges are
· characterized by agreement on a definition of the dimensions of the problem.
· tend to have clear pathways to solutions.
· are more readily managed: the leader can form a team, make a plan, make decisions, hold people accountable and execute the solution.
In contrast, adaptive challenges are much less clear and perspectives on the issue at hand differ among stakeholders.
Adaptive challenges are those that
· aren’t “solved” through traditional management approaches, because adaptive challenges involve legitimate, yet competing, perspectives — different views of the problem and different perspectives on what might constitute a viable solution.
· have solutions and implementation pathways that are unclear; defining a pathway for the solution requires learning by all. This “all” means that the primary locus of responsibility is not a single entity or person.
· require a different type of leadership and often require leadership at many levels.
Heifetz (2009) identifies six broad strategies for addressing adaptive challenges:
1. Getting on the balcony - Stepping out of the fray to see the key patterns and the bigger picture. Leaders also need to recognize the patterns of work avoidance and the potential for conflict.
2. Identifying the adaptive challenge - Putting the unspoken issues out on the table. It also involves recognizing the challenges to and uncomfortable changes that may be required in values, practices and relationships.
3. Regulating distress - Creating a safe environment for challenges to be discussed, and creating a space for diversity of opinion, experiences, and values as well as the opportunity to challenge assumptions. Stress is accepted, tolerated, and regulated by the leader.
4. Maintaining disciplined attention - Being aware of patterns of behavior that indicate that there is a purposeful or unconscious attempt to avoid disturbing or difficult issues. These patterns and behaviors can show up as scapegoating or blaming others; denying that the problem exists or is truly problematic; or diverting attention by focusing on technical issues.
5. Giving the work world back - Creating conditions that help people take greater responsibility for the work of change, including defining and solving the problems. The leader supports staff rather than directing or controlling them. Giving the work back to the people also requires instilling and expressing confidence in others so that they will take risks, and backing them up when they make mistakes.
6. Protecting all voices - Relying on others to raise questions about adaptive challenges and provide support and protection for employees who identify internal conflicts in the organization. This includes providing a legitimate space for those who constructively disagree.
Citation: NIRN
https://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/learn-implementation/systemic-change
https://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/learn-implementation/implementation-drivers/leadership
https://implementation.fpg.unc.edu/module-2/leadership-drivers
https://www.sgaumc.org/files/files_library/technical_vs_adaptive_challenges.pdf--
Leadership Challenges in Maine -- issue with this article is the focus on poverty.